COVID...FACT OR FICTION

RajRaj Switzerland
The latest data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention showed that COVID-19 vaccines officially have over one million adverse effects cases and 21,000 deaths.

The data, which was compiled for the federal Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), revealed over 3,400 miscarriages by pregnant women and over 35,000 permanently disabled individuals. Moreover, over 110,000 people ended up in hospitals due to adverse reactions to their vaccine shots.

According to the Department of Health and Human Services, the strength of VAERS lies in its national scope, which can provide quick and early warnings for safety problems regarding vaccines. As part of the CDC and the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) multi-system approach to post-licensure vaccine safety monitoring, the program is designed to rapidly detect unusual or unexpected patterns of adverse events.

Despite these massive numbers, reports to VAERS remain voluntary, which means that it is highly likely that there are far more unreported cases than reported ones. Many physicians and scientists believe that the true figures are actually much higher, with a recent study led by a Columbia University researcher putting the actual figures to be higher by a factor of 20. If the underreporting factor is correct, then it would mean that there have actually been around 400,000 deaths due to COVID-19 vaccines.

Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin has previously held forums featuring testimonies of individuals injured by the vaccines, noting that among the deaths reported to the CDC, 30 percent occurred within two days after vaccination. (Related: Study reveals FEWER than 1% of vaccine injuries are reported to VAERS.)

Brighteon.TV
In the abstract from the Columbia study, the researchers noted that accurate estimates of the COVID vaccine-induced severe adverse events and death rates are critical for risk-benefit ratio analyses of the vaccinations and boosters against the virus in different age groups.

The health department also pointed out that the VAERS report is not documentation that shows a link is established between a vaccine and an adverse event. However, they noted that VAERS is a “passive” system of reporting, and it receives reports for only a small fraction of actual adverse events. FDA data show massive adverse events numbers
Files that have been obtained from the FDA in November through the Freedom of Information Act recorded 158,893 adverse events from the Pfizer vaccine in the first six weeks of distribution, including nearly 36,000 incidents of “nervous system disorders.”

The lawsuit was filed by a group called Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency and is comprised of over 30 professors and scientists from respected universities such as Yale, Harvard, UCLA and Brown. With court papers filed in December, the FDA proposed that it be given 55 years to release all 329,000 pages of documents related to the Pfizer vaccine, as requested by the group. It has since been modified to move the delay for up to 75 years.

Vaccines ineffective against omicron variant?
As the world is moving forward with the omicron variant of the coronavirus, it seems that the new strain has mutated so much that it ignores both vaccines and natural immunity from people who have already recovered from sickness. Most public health authorities are pushing again for another shot of the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines, with Israel now administering fourth doses to its citizens. However, it seems that the timeline between boosters is becoming shorter as cases continue to rise.

The need for a booster is contradicted by data that indicate the current inoculations do not prevent people from getting infected with the omicron variant. John Abramson, a doctor from Harvard Medical School said that the first step is for people to give up the illusion that the primary purpose of modern medical research is to improve the health of Americans in the most effective and efficient manner.

Comments

  • RajRaj Switzerland
    2nd degree: Joe Biden urged the unvaccinated, including children, to get injected with the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine as the country recently recorded over one million new infections in a day.

    Videos of Biden emerged on social media warning American parents to keep their children away from unvaccinated people and to surround them with people who are vaccinated if their kids are too young to be vaccinated. “There is no excuse for anyone being unvaccinated. This continues to be a pandemic of the unvaccinated,” Biden said.

    New research has found that children ages 5 to 11 years of age do not need “unnecessary” COVID-19 vaccines. Experts say children have an almost zero risk of getting sick from SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, yet the Biden administration wants all of them to get injected with “vaccines that could cause them to develop heart disease or die.”

    A peer-reviewed study co-authored by viral immunologist and biologist, Dr. Jessica Rose, found that myocarditis rates were significantly higher in people aged 13 to 23 years old within the eight weeks after the injections were first rolled out.

    “In an act of censorship, this paper had been temporarily removed and it has now been killed without criticism of the work,” Rose shared.

    A team of researchers in Great Britain came to a similar conclusion that children are naturally immune to virus. People should keep in mind that all vaccines available are only those known as having emergency use authorization (EUA).

    Brighteon.TV
    Federal and state laws forcing parents to obey
    At the federal level, the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA) has defined child abuse and neglect as “any recent act or failure to act on the part of a parent or caregiver that results in death, serious physical or emotional harm, sexual abuse or exploitation or an act or failure to act that present an imminent risk of serious harm.”

    A publication in the Child Welfare Information Gateway reported that approximately 42 states and the American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands define abuse as “including acts or circumstances that threaten the child with harm or substantial risk of harm to the child’s health or welfare.” The word “approximately” is used to stress the fact that the states often amend their laws.

    Neglect, on the other hand, is frequently defined as the “failure of a parent or other person with responsibility for the child to provide medical care or supervision to the degree that the child’s health, safety and well-being are threatened with harm.”

    Ten states specifically define medical neglect as “failing to provide any special medical treatment or mental health care needed by the child.” These include Arkansas, Connecticut, Florida, Mississippi, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas and West Virginia.

    Oregon state law says that failing to provide adequate medical care is child abuse, and failing to vaccinate a child during an outbreak is considered as child abuse in some states.

    A study examining the relation of vaccine refusal and medical neglect under child welfare laws presented several public health implications, one of which states: “Invoking child welfare laws to improve compliance with vaccine recommendations deserves caution,” because so few courts have addressed whether vaccine refusal constitutes medical neglect.

    In the absence of a direct statutory mandate, state public health officials should issue clear and explicit guidance for providers and Child Protection Services (CPS) as to “whether vaccine refusals constitute medical neglect.”

    The study concludes by enjoining state lawmakers to debate whether vaccine refusals constitute medical neglect and incorporate their conclusions into state statues.

    “There haven’t been any liability lawsuits filed against parents who failed to vaccinate their children,” said Dorit Rubinstein Reiss, a professor of law at the University of California Hastings College of the Law who writes frequently about vaccination policy and law.

    “Non-vaccination was pretty rare until the ’80s and ’90s, so we haven’t had enough preventable disease transmission to raise a lot of claims,” Reiss said. “If we have more harm caused by this, it’s inevitable that a lawsuit will happen at some point. I don’t think lawsuits are a very strong deterrent, but I think it is important to have compensation for the child, who shouldn’t have to pay the price for these decisions.” https://www.brighteon.com/863b53e1-f1de-454a-8878-0b7fff6429be
  • RajRaj Switzerland
    3rd degree: Another major bombshell has been found by Project Veritas in leaked military documents.

    It turns out that ivermectin, which has largely been banned in the United States ever since the plandemic started, is highly effective at treating the Fauci Flu.

    A section of the document reveals that ivermectin was “identified as curative in April 2020” because it “works throughout all phases of illness because it both inhibits viral replication and modulates the immune response.”

    You read that right: The government knows and fully admits, at least to other government insiders, that ivermectin is a cure for covid that has been kept out of the hands of the American people for political and eugenics reasons.

    Also admitted in the same document is the fact that hydroxychloroquine is also a curative substance for covid. It is outlined as a “SARSr-Cov inhibitor,” as is interferon.

    The plan, as we now see, was to deprive the public of curative agents like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine in order to steer the herd straight into remdesivir (which Tony Fauci partially owns) as well as the “vaccines” introduced by Donald “father of the vaccine” Trump under Operation Warp Speed.

    Leaked military documents admit that covid vaccines do not protect against any covid variants
    Another revelation in the documents explains that EcoHealth Alliance, in its proposal to DARPA for funding, admitted that the “vaccine approach lacks sufficient epitope coverage to protect against quasispecies of coronavirus.”

    Brighteon.TV
    What this means, of course, is that any new mutation or variant that occurs in deviation from the original SARS-CoV-2 can easily bypass the injections and their associated “boosters.”

    Not only that, but the jabs are “potentially detrimental,” the documents go on to reveal, because they damage the immune system’s antibody response, particularly to other covid variants.

    While an unvaccinated person who becomes exposed to the original Fauci Flu and recovers develops permanent immunity to all mutations and variants, the same cannot be said for the fully vaccinated, whose bodies will not be able to handle encountering them.

    This is where the AIDS thesis of these injections comes into play, meaning the fully vaccinated are basically undergoing a process of immune wasting much like an AIDS patient.

    “The nature of using a spike protein vaccine with one epitope against a spike protein vaccine with a quasispecies may explain the unusual (and potentially detrimental) antibody response amongst the vaccinated to the new COVID variants,” the documents read.

    Fundamentally, the knowledge the proposal provides signals that the risk of Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE) from vaccination should be evaluated with high priority, on top of the reality that single-epitope vaccines will have little effect against SARSr-CoV-WIV, as indicated in the proposal.”

    All of this would have been written before there were even any vaccines available, at least as far as the public was aware. It was also before there really even was a plandemic, again at least as far as the public was aware.

    Meanwhile, cheap, safe and effective ivermectin is so taboo now that doctors are actually being threatened with termination for prescribing it to their patients.

    If this is not evidence enough to convince you that the powers that be want you dead and not “safe” as they claim, well, then perhaps nothing will.

    “Who here made it through the biggest psy-op in history and didn’t get jabbed? Congrats!” joked one commenter at Zero Hedge.

    “Yep, the biggest con in American history,” responded another. “Why is Fauci still a free man?”

    “Not only do they know that ivermectin works, they know that high dose IV vitamin C works miracles even in the most critical of cases,” noted another.
Sign In or Register to comment.